A scientific paper entitled “An Overview of Scientific Debate of Global Warming and Climate Change” has recently come out of the University of Karachi, Pakistan. The paper’s author, Prof. Shamshad Akhtar delves into earth’s natural temperature variations of the past 1000 years, and concludes that any modern warming trend has been hijacked by political & environmental agendas, and that the science (tackled below) has been long-ignored and at times deliberately manipulated.
The published paper–available in full HERE— sets out its intent:
Climate change is NOT a new phenomenon. The palaeo-climatic studies reveal that during the Pleistocene and Holocene periods several warm and cold periods occurred, resulting in changes of sea level and in climatic processes like the rise and fall of global average temperature and rainfall.
The United Nation’s politicizing of global warming/climate change
(via the media and summits) has made it difficult to take another look
at the subject’s scientific and academic status. But in this paper an
attempt has been made to examine the complexity of the problem in the
light of available facts related to the atmosphere and climate system:
The ultimate source of energy for the heating of earth’s surface and the atmosphere is the Sun.
Out of the total solar radiation that reaches the top of the atmosphere, about 49% reaches the earth’s surface (insolation). 31% is reflected back to space, while 20% is absorbed by the atmosphere.
This shows the atmosphere absorbs only 20% of solar radiation directly while the earth’s surface is the major source of energy for the heating of the atmosphere.
Pro human-induced global warming scientists exaggerate the contribution of carbon dioxide as a major greenhouse gas in absorbing long-wave earth’s radiation. The fact is water vapour is the single largest atmospheric greenhouse gas (2% by volume), Carbon dioxide is second (0.0385% by volume).
Water vapour contributes 95% to the greenhouse effect, all other greenhouse gases combined contribute only 5%. Furthermore, the man-made portion of carbon dioxide contributes only 0.117% to the greenhouse effect.
The IPCC does not consider water vapor a greenhouse gas in its reports.
In addition, water vapour absorbs in a much wider band of long wave radiation (4-8 micrometre and 12-70 micrometre bands), whereas Carbon dioxide absorbs in narrow bands (13-16 micrometre) and ozone absorbs in a much smaller narrow band (9-10 micrometre). Thus, water vapour absorbs in a much wider wave length band, it has the single largest greenhouse effect among all the greenhouse gases.
Earth’s temperature was never constant.
Instead, its past temperatures varied in cyclical patterns. Earth’s temperatures for the past 1000 years have been constructed on the basis of historical records, measured temperature data and several proxy data (ice core data, tree ring analysis, pollen analysis).
Earth’s temperature pattern in the past 1000 years shows two relatively long cycles:
According to Dr. Steffensen of Neil Bohr Institute of Geophysicist, University of Copenhagen —who conducted 3km deep ice core study in Greenland— the Little Ice Age marked the lowest temperature in the last 8000 years of earth’s history, while the Medieval Warm period was about 1.5C warmer than the present day (needless to say, without the extensive burning of fossil fuels).
There is a large group of scientists who strongly oppose IPCC’s claims of global warming caused by human activity.
Some of the contradictions and neglecting factors are discussed further in Prof. S. Akhtar’s full paper, which can be downloaded HERE, but I’ve created a succinct snapshot of the topics below:
Earth’s climate system consists of several interactive components — lithosphere (rocks), hydrosphere (water), cryosphere (sphere of ice), biosphere (a living organism) and atmosphere (sphere of air). There are several subsystems of these spheres which interact and develop a complex system of the climate system of the earth. Therefore, any forecast of the climate system based upon selected parameters of stimulated computer model as used by IPCC for future projection and estimation can never give a real and correct picture of global warming/climate change.
IPCC reports were not allowed to consider natural factors of climate change — even though pieces of evidence on the basis of ice cores, tree rings and historical data confirm the Medieval Warm Period and Little Ice Age which was caused by natural processes, like these:
Urban areas are much warmer than the surrounding open/rural areas because of the building materials, high density of buildings, high rise buildings, large number of vehicles and heat emissions. Since the 1970s, urban areas have grown rapidly in number and size all over the world. Very importantly, almost all the weather stations are located in cities. So rapid growth in urbanization has created a bias toward warmer temperature. This factor was also not considered by the IPCC.
Even more telling, Prof. John Christi, astrophysics of the University of Alabama, studied ground recorded temperature and found the temperature is rising while the weather satellite temperature data and air balloon recorded temperature show little change.
Only 100 weather stations existed in 1875, all of which were located in Europe and North America. This number increased to 1,700 in 1975, and since then the number of stations has increased dramatically to 10,000 at present. Therefore, most of the stations did not exist prior to mid -the 1970s.
Also, the majority of the stations are located on the continents of the northern hemisphere, in the mid-latitudes and in urban areas — meaning our climate data set is biased towards a landmass.
A major blow to IPCC credibility came on October 19, 2009, when thousands of documents and emails were leaked out by some computer hackers from the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of UK’s East Anglia University. This leak came to be unimaginatively known as Climate Gate.
The documents reveal misconduct of the top IPCC climate scientists in the UK and USA in creating manufactured data about the release of carbon dioxide through the burning of fossil fuels and industries causing global warming. Some of the US governmental agencies like the US National Climate Data Centre and NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies were also involved in data manipulation.
Michael Mann’s infamous ‘Hockey Stick’ graph has two major flaws.
First, it shows that earth’s temperatures were below normal for a long period –1000AD to 1970s– then temperatures increasing dramatically since 1980s. And secondly, it also alters the long-accepted Medieval Warm Period (950 AD to 1350AD) so as to seem as colder than originally thought.
It was found out that Mann’s graph was drawn on the basis of very small ring samples (10 out of 85 samples) and by data manipulation and statistical exaggeration.
Despite these shocking revelations, the ‘Hockey Stick’ is still used in all IPCC reports. Since the IPCC’s third report in 2007, Mann’s graph has replaced the original one (which clearly identified the MWP) used in first and second reports — a change strongly criticized by many climate scientists.
According to IPCC reports issued 2007, global mean surface air temp has increased by 0.3C to 0.6C since the late 19th century. As a result of melting of glaciers and polar ice sheets, global sea level has risen by 15 to 20 cm over the past 100 years, and if this trend continues sea level will rise up to 50 to 80 meters by the end of 2100. Low land areas and islands like the Maldives will submerge into sea water…
Professor Nelis Axil of Stockholm University and president of International Organization of Sea level change and coastal evolution conducted several studies on the beaches of Maldives. He concluded that during the last 50 years there has no permanent rise in sea level in the area…